Music represents a very small percentage of artistic expression yet holds a huge portion of the industry in terms of gross revenue. I have been in and out of the music industry most of my life and have always been uncomfortable with the model of music expression the industry has created. They have been creating, bottling and shipping art in cute marketable packages since the first musician put a tip jar on his piano.
What we’re talking about now is value. Labels, radio stations, publishers all created value because they collected music and sold them as commodities. The consumer had no choice but to buy into the business model in order to gain access. Well, all that is changing. As the industry adapts to combat file sharing, a large question looms in my mind. How are artists going to stay profitable as they lose their ability to control access?
The short answer is the live show. File sharing, Pandora, and other free outlets are sucking the sustainability out of selling audio. Fortunately, nothing can replace live music. Festivals are thriving, bands are still touring and if anything, the proliferation of file sharing is only benefiting show promotion. I think it’s an extraordinary time for live musicians.
The deeper issue is the problem with profiting from art in the first place. Whether there is label or management pressure, most contemporary musicians are creating in a marketable box created by the industry years ago. There’s hooks to worry about. There’s song length. There’s the overwhelming urgency to be able to “do this for a living.” All of those factors weigh heavily on the creative heart of most music writers.
All of which begs the question. What if all musicians wrote music purely for the art? How would the industry look then?